64
prior the Japanese occupation,
o had a wa damage Compensation scheme
own setup in Kay Kary,
further
extent, I should feel justified in/pressing
the Ministry of Supply to make some payment,
but for the reasons given below I consider
that I should not be justified in so
proceeding.
I am advised that no legal claim
lies against either the Government of
Hong Kong or H. M. G. in respect of this
particular category of claim, nor indeed
has it been suggested that any legal claim
exists.
It is possible that had there been
some form of war risks goods insurance scheme
seheme- in Hong Kong the claimants in
question might now be able to effect some
recovery from the Chinese contractors,
as the latter might in turn have been
entitled to some payment under one or
ot her of the above schemes, had they
been set up. I see considerable danger.
in any case in making payments ex gratia,
where no legal liability exists, for what
is in effect war damage; and to make such
payments in the case of a particular
category of claimants might very well have
awkward repercussions in Hong Kong where
there were many claims amounting to a
very large sum in total in respect of various
losses and damage arising out of the war
which the Government of Hong Kong
themselves have decided should not be met
even to a limited extent under any war
damage
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.